'Security system is said to be one of the most vital aspects in doing business\r'

' protective covering system is said to be one of the almost resilient aspects in doing business and ensuring the interest of the ac high society and the welfargon of all the employees. Thus, the security personnel are in charge of guarding and protecting the companys resources and its people. As for the episode of Walter, a security guard in Bug, it is big that he has perpetrate a wrongdoing against the company and to his obligation, as one of the security personnel that is accountable of guarding the companys business.As a security guard for Bug, Walters primary duty is to protect the interest of the business and defend the companys place against the probable deliberate subversion coming from outer forces. Thus, knowing the fact that Steve is working for Wiretap, Walter should have non freed Steve and let him mountain pass away from Bug, as if zilch happened and he has not possibly gathered vital information about Bugs nature of doing business.Under the civil wrong l aw, Walter has committed an offense, which is that of breach of duty, as he conciously let Steve to walk away despite of the fact that he has do an offense in tresspassing the private domain of the company. Hence, Walter could be held liable to any harm and damages that superpower happen to Bug, as a result of undefeated subversion of Steve to the companys premises.More so, Walter could be held accountable to any probable lost in the company because of being remiss and disregarding direct orders, which is that of protecting and ensuring the companys resources and confidentiality in doing business. The tort law, on the other hand, is considered to be different as oppose to other areas of law because it is only a branch of civil law. Unlike in vile law, wherein the plaintiff is always regarded as the state and the defendant, the conflict in tort law is only between two different private parties.More so, in tort law, the punishment for unsuccesfull defendant is only a function o f paying and shouldering for the damages of the plaintiff, which evidently different as oppose to other areas of law wherein the defendant is ordinarily punished by the state incase of turn out guilty of committing a crime. Reference Theories of tort Law. (2003). Retrieved June 12, 2009, from http://plato. stanford. edu/entries/tort-theories/ Larson, A. (2003). sloppiness and Tort Law. Retrieved June 12, 2009, from http://www. expertlaw. com/library/personal_injury/negligence. html\r\n'