Nabakov and Orwell: The Politics of World-Building Essay

Nabakovs primary point in expert Readers and Good Writers is to embrace the notion that the best writers create new realities protrude of chaos in their writing. Good readers, thence, must abandon traditional notions of score and socioeconomic theory, and approach kit and caboodle with a sense of imagination and a well-h stard sense of aesthetics. Orwells famous Politics and the English Language bears sure similarities to this, and may well meet been a precursor to Nabakovs theories. Orwell believes that authorities led to the over-complication of language, from flowery metaphors to indecipherable scientific jargon.This seems readily apparent during preference season, when candidates hide true perspectives and platforms behind a bevy of blinding buzzwords. However, it is eventful to note that what Orwell excoriates, Nabakov celebratesafter all, Nabakov insists that a respectable reader will have a good dictionary, the better with which to map out this new populace that the ir favorite author is shaping. This is certainly true in a college education, where one cannot simply advocate simplicity and refuse to learn any complexity.In Orwells defense, he was not attempting to offer criticism on a literary level, but wished to comment on the political rhetoric of the time, which then (as now) sought to use inflated phrases to inflate candidates who, in reality, were downright holler inside. Nabakov advocates something closer to a cause/effect structurehe does not denigrate the (often complicated) politics embedded within literary fiction. Rather, he urges good readers to enjoy the stories they read as fantastic literature first, and political screed second.Orwell would be unlikely to agree with this view, as his two most famous works (Animal Farm and 1984) serve as political types against Communism, and the stories wrapped around these warning are, for all intents and purposes, ornamental only. To extend the metaphor further, Nabakovs theory stresses the necessary of the ornaments in order to appreciate the whole tree viewing a story with a pre-packaged idea of what it means was just as untoward to Nabakov as the reuse of political slogans was to Orwell it is nothing more than an excuse to forfend original thought, which is necessary to good writers, readers, and politicians.