Land Ethic :: essays research papers

The fine-tune ethic is a holistic view of ecosystems. It entails an entire view of a biotic community to hold all of nature, not just the singleistic components which incorporate our environment. Great efforts would be intromitn by supporters of the land ethic to support an ecosystem that was threatened. The individual components that patch up the ecosystem are not of great concern to supporters of this theory they would vie that a threat to an individual existence, even protected or endangered, should be evaluated on whether or not the protected or endangered species does endanger the haleness of the whole system. A supporter of the land ethic argument would flummox consequences to weigh regarding the value of the threatened individual and how it relates to the survival of individuals of the group. If the group were to ache a threatening blow that could affect the livelihood or humankind of members of the controlling group one would expect that the threatened organism c ould be evaluated for possible non- tribute. In contrast, a Respect for Nature ethic believes that any(prenominal) animal or living organism should be protected because that organism is deserving of its own individual worth the fact that it is protected or endangered would be of little concern to these supporters. The simple fact that an individual is threatened is more than sufficient to justify that great efforts be taken to protect that individual entity. The Respect for Nature ethic followers would argue that every organism is worthy of protection because of an inherent worth that entitles that entity to protection from destruction. If society were to take either side of this argument, there would be consequences. To take the land ethic view, our current use of the land for farming and meridian livestock would convert and our view as the conqueror of the land would change to more towards a biotic citizen or a member of the land community.